An interesting thing is a sort of developmental gap in certain group ideologies. This could go in the worldview section, or it could be on a page looking at cyclical aspects of how tribes evolve, but it could also go on this page.

Tibetans had an unusually developed science tradition that was a result of their geographic isolation. In other words some sort of physical security allowed introspection which developed sciences rather than developing defensive things because of imminent external threats, though the Tibetans did have a long history of external threats.

Unfortunately there really are 'fake sciences' which people should not waste their time on, but in this video a person can see the way trivial insecurity compels a group to develop 'fake sciences' around things like political threats.



The 'Big Trap' is a melting pot version of traps used by homogenous groups to snare animals. This is a clear variation of a tribal tool, but because it has unique features in the melting pot, it will be considered here a melting pot archetype.

The example used here will be an upcoming event from 'the war on terror'.

The backdrop for the event is a pending collapse in global oil markets.


One very reliable difference between tribal and melting pot hunters / soldiers is that tribals consider their actions subordinate to nature, their first step is to observe, while melting potters always start with an ambition, a plan of attack, or correcting something that they think 'nature' got wrong.

This invariably is invisible to melting potters up close, it becomes the new 'natural landscape', so that a person from one melting pot 'sees' the silliness in another melting pot, but not in his or her own.

"After sunspot development research was judged un-Marxist, twenty-seven astronomers disappeared between 1936 and 1938. The Meteorological Office was violently purged as early as 1933 for failing to predict weather harmful to the crops. But the toll was especially high among writers."



When a tribal group hunts large prey they try to 'melt' into the landscape, their group tries to 'synchronize' with the landscape.

This tactic extended, millennia ago, to warfare.

One human group would try to use stealth to attack another human group, then the tactic became more sophisticated to include a trap which precedes the attack.


Every human, and every group of humans, has generic human flaws. These are used to set the traps.

In other words any generic human weakness can become the basis for a trap, just as an animal's weakness becomes a basis for a trap targeting it. For example if a mouse likes cheese it will generally ignore some warning signs in order to get cheese.


As human races dispersed, they also commingled. This created a homogenous remnant i.e., the original tribal groups, along with numerous other groups that had a bit of the 'genetic history' that allowed a few of them to identify traps set by the original group. When that tribal group tries to snare a group that has some of its hunting skills, the trap is not well hidden.

To make this 'war on terror' example clear, first the parties involved will be identified, vaguely. It's important to understand the concept of gender descent as it relates to tribalism, that is discussed briefly on the 'Marsupial theory' page.

A copied quote from that page

"No evidence of Neanderthal mitochondrial DNA has been found in modern humans. This suggests that successful Neanderthal admixture happened in pairings with Neanderthal males and modern human females."



Group 1) Political Arabs, as ethnic groups, and Muslims, as a melting pot group, here called 'Arabs'.

This is a melting pot group that includes many poorly differentiated tribes at an early part of the cycle of increasing melting pot power. It includes Iran and many developing third world political entities.

Example https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gamal_Abdel_Nasser

Group 2) Jews as an ethnic group, here called 'Jews'.

This is actually a melting pot group consisting of many tribes, but the historical context is important. Thousands of years ago Jews in the Middle East were very similar to Neanderthals before them and the global colonizers that followed them in an important way. The 'colonization' or expansion involved primarily male Jews with females from conquered tribes for at least several generations. This created a sort of genetic bubble, a vast temporary increase in apparent genetic strength for the male bloodline of the conquering group, followed eventually by an accelerating collapse until absorption into a less extended survivable group.

An important point here is that the 'success' of Jews through this process in the past was derived from certain very specific and identifiable values which have been scrapped to a large degree today. An analogy would be the success which was derived from the 'singular deity' as opposed to groups of individuals which 'worship' more tangible multiple deities.

The same process is at an earlier stage for many other groups around the world who have extensively colonized other tribes. The net long term effect is extinction of the original male bloodlines as a balancing effect takes place. In other words, for example Neanderthals are not entirely 'extinct', rather their male bloodlines have been reabsorbed. There are comparable extinctions and reabsorptions in female bloodlines but it is difficult to study them through history that often has a patriarchal bias.

It would be wise to study this process rather than simply letting it unfold. The energy and sophistication of this natural process is much stronger than any political or emotional tendencies to limit warfare.

Group 3) Jews as a melting pot group, here called 'Political Jews'.

This group includes the male descendants of the original Jewish tribe, but for the specific purposes of this page, it focuses mainly on one subgroup which mixed, in the distant past, with an Eastern European group.

The original non Jewish remnant of the Eastern European group has less genetic dilution than the part that split and converted to Judaism. They thus have a slightly different characteristic despite the overlap, and have both consequent advantages and disadvantages.

The Jewish part of this old Eastern European tribe has mixed with numerous other 'Jewish descendant' tribals, with the net effect being a vast 'male tribal' melting pot group that must either accelerate its expansion and remove the other melting pot groups, or go extinct in terms of the original male blood lines, like Neandertals.

At this point the 'accelerated expansion' has been negated by natural processes and is not viable. Personifying the interests of this male bloodline might make things more clear, and essentially that is already done in a 'collective unconscious' sort of way. So called 'anti semites' are tribals who smell blood. They vaguely perceive an entity i.e., a group, the descendants of males from a specific tribe who have grossly overextended, and they, the 'anti semites' are reacting properly, in a way that nature uses to precede the extinction and reabsorption of a bloodline.

The process will become extremely messy if enough people don't understand what is developing.

Example https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stephen_Miller_(political_advisor)

Group 4) An unidentified Eastern European tribal group, here called 'Unidentified group a'.

This group is deduced from evidence. It would require knowledge of Eastern European history to identify the specific tribal group.

Group 5) Generic melting potters, as described on the 'Global Idiots' archetype page, here called 'Melting potters'.

These are people who react collectively to news events in a predictable way. Every melting pot person has elements of this, but as conflict polarizes groups the manifestation is more clear in certain groups / individuals. What a lot of people miss is that many groups that call themselves tribes are actually diffuse melting pots ‘built around a tribe’. Another way to say it is that there is a continuum from tribal to melting pot, and groups often aren't where they think they are on that continuum.



One interesting fact regarding these groups is that somebody who believes him or herself to be in one group is sometimes actually in another group, because gender descent is more of a reality than cultural affiliation.

Most notably, for this example, many female Jews are 'more descendent' from tribal interests of maternal bloodlines that still exist, but which they are not cognizant of. The 'pattern' in which their female ancestors were colonized is sometimes used to 'justify' inclusion in a group fated for extinction, except that now there are 'Eastern' philosophical influences that make former vulnerabilities or flaws into useful attributes i.e., a sublimation process which is potentially available to anyone.

The same applies equally of course to female ancestors of male Jews, but in a patriarchal society the 'balancing mechanism' has been pushed too far in one direction and swings 'too far' eventually in the other direction.

Male bloodlines of the original colonizing Jewish group, whether in male or female Jews today, attract predators i.e., 'anti semites', but the specific breakaway group that left 'unidentified group a' is the main strategic target of that group. This will lead, or has led, to a concentration of descendants from that bloodline being in some vulnerable position, a 'vulnerable position' which can be deduced, and is a natural outcome of bigger influences, but which will not be easily visible except in retrospect.

This 'vulnerable position' has been refined to some extent by competing tribal interests, including 'unidentified group a' so that the precision of the attack is not limited geographically, as it would be in a conventional tribal attack.

Some interesting social trends are an obvious defensive reaction to this 'new' type of attack, but for reasons that would need a separate page these defensive steps are not useful.


The fashion of political correctness has prevented a general study of this phenomenon, but basically an individual's reactions, senses etc pertain to a specific group which may be different than the group they identify with.

Those individuals who created this trap are evidently cognizant of that, and have used it to induce 'allies' into participating. The further an 'ally' is from perceiving the trap, the more he or she will feel empowered by participating, and the more 'expendable' they are too.

In this case, a group of Jews from Eastern Europe has some tribal overlap with 'unidentified group a', an overlap that does not occur in other groups of Jews.

Some among these Jews can identify their traps, which makes them a mandatory ally, or a threat.

The specific group of Eastern European Jews can be excluded from being 'unidentified group a', but the interaction between the two has reached a stage similar to the 'final stage' of melting pots where a small number of powerful melting pots compete to survive.

Ethnic Arabs with tribal interests, along with political Arabs e.g. Muslims, have carefully been walked into an elaborate battle against Israel.

The most likely scenario is that the conflict has been planned to be outside any moderating influence, a free for all, but once the situation stabilizes the host countries of 'unidentified group a' in Eastern Europe will quickly land on their feet.

Western Europe and the United States are likely to become very unstable politically, Israel will likely not exist as a country within a year of the event, which could be around the 'Holocaust forum' on January 23, 2020.

The backdrop for this trap which is playing out starts in Europe pre WWII.

Jews were, like many ethnic groups, heavily persecuted in Europe. This ultimately led many of them to try to assimilate, synchronize, with the larger group among which they lived.

This, in turn, led to some alliances which were calculated as being 'profitable' to all sides i.e., subjectively 'fair' arrangements which each side negotiated, explicitly or implicitly, trying to safeguard their own interests and the interests of those for whom they claimed to speak. 

The state of Israel was established as a 'melting pot offering' to Jews. It provided a context in which Jews could supposedly form alliances with other groups, as per melting pot custom.

Before this, no Jew would pretend to 'speak for Jews', but now there was a framework negotiated by some Jews that tried to claim the right to speak for all Jews. 


A prelude to the trap that will be pointed out here is a minor version of the same trap.

Those Jews who had 'surrendered' to the melting pot among which they lived still had the language, culture etc of Jews who were not interested in joining a new culture. Thus, they were able to 'sell' their position to some other non assimilated Jews in an effective way. They served as both ambassadors of the melting pot and proselytizers for it.


So, in the context of global politics post WWII, there were

a) Jews disinterested in group politics, i.e., observing the real, nonpolitical aspects of their tradition,

b) Jews committed to one or another political side, i.e., trying to use 'their traditional group' for a political purpose,

c) and Jews somewhere between those two sides.

Then came the 'war on terror', which brought a new surge of power and political wealth to those Jews who were vested in the use of Judaism as a political tool.

This 'war on terror' though was more a manifestation of tribal alliances than of anything to do with terrorism.

Ultimately it was about staking new melting pot ground and creating a vast mechanism to make it profitable.


When 9/11 happened, a lot of people assumed that 'Jews' were behind it.

There were certainly some Jewish people who were involved in a way that was clumsy, in fact a bit too clumsy.


As the scenario developed, it became clear that another group had made use of the political interests of political Jews to walk those political Jews into a vast trap which is about to be sprung, again.

The exact group behind this has some common tribal weaknesses though, some of the weaknesses that have 'taught' other tribes to be cautious with large traps. The identity of that group is not clear yet. They are distinctly Eastern European and homogenous, but just as they used the 'human flaws' of political Jews to set a trap for them, they created a trap for themselves.


As the 'war on terror' progressed, the populist narrative of a Jewish hand behind it grew. The evidence always seemed reliable, clear, anybody could look honestly and see what appeared to be heavy influence by 'political Jews' in this framework.

Those political Jews who appear to have clumsily led the 'war on terror' are now realizing that although they seem to have gotten political benefit from their involvement, the long term cost is something they are familiar with.

So, at this point those same political Jews who, claiming to speak 'politically' for Judaism, amassed a great problem, are now eager for a solution.

The solution that was offered, and to which they evidently agreed, was an attack within Israel that would, from their perspective, push the focus of the war on terror away from them.

The context for this attack appears to be a conference that is scheduled for January in Israel.



This looks a little bit different than 9/11 though.

9/11 relied on fairly widespread knowledge of 'some pending undefined action' among a  pretty significant number of people with direct ties to the Jewish community and several other groups.

In other words there were people within political Jewry and various other groups who knew 'something' was developing, and there were people who knew exactly what was developing, and the latter group could 'justify' their plans, they could be articulated, discussed etc.

The current event is planned in a much more 'compartmentalized' way.

The same 'Unidentified group a' has control of enough assets within Israel to make the plan happen, but is not able to utilize most of those resources, people etc, directly.

This led to their first mistake, a massive footprint created by having to use a high level 'reliable' asset to do some nitty gritty work.

This same mistake was made a number of times in the past and its specific nuances have become a signature of Unidentified group a.


Here are the groups listed above, and where select parts of those groups now stand.

1) Arabs are closely allied as an ethnic group with Jews historically and with unidentified group a in recent history. Iranians, not specifically Arab, but included in this bloc, are most closely connected to unidentified group a and their political leadership probably has made preparations that are indiscreet. This, ironically, is probably being covered up by those political Jews who are aware of it on the same grounds 9/11 preparations were ignored i.e., an inaccurate, mistaken, vague sense of political 'national security'.

2) Jews who are disinterested in politics but who are in the physical area where preparations are taking place will be aware that an event is developing but will not articulate anything, out of caution. Their access to information is the 'tone' of the preparations, something which has evolved into a problem for the political Jews who cooperate with 'unidentified group a'. Because most of them are not aware of the specifics, but are aware something is imminent, and because they have been misled by those they mistakenly trust, they are likely to look for safety in the wrong places.

3) Political Jews generally externalize their defense, they 'trust' that their political conglomeration e.g. including the state of Israel, and other political groups, is ‘wisely’ looking out for their interests.

note / most political Jews from a certain geographic area are not able to perceive the difference between their groups actions and the political actions of unidentified group a. This is a result of compromises made in the past by political Jews from that small area. Those political Jews from Eastern Europe who are participating may articulate a 'Jewish' motive but at some point they will realize that they have cooperated in what may be the effective end of Jewish political power in many countries for generations.

4) Unidentified group a has cultivated paradoxical relationships with several groups in an unsustainable way. At this point their calculation is that the developing 'muslim' bloc i.e., Arabs, Iranians and third world converts to Islam, is a more 'long term useful' ally than political Jews.

5) Melting potters are being set up to take a stance behind what will be presented to them as 'their' tribal interests. So called 'white nationalists' in the U.S. and elsewhere are trying to become the leading edge of melting potters in many countries as a result of what will probably be a thorough gutting of liberal influence in previously 'progressive' zones.


Once the event has taken place, the remaining political Jews who are still allied with unidentified group a will start to realize that they have been hoodwinked. Their 'survival option' will be a retreat to some 'sanctioned' Jewish subset which is adequately controlled by unidentified group a.

Arab influence will suddenly skyrocket but by then there will be additional factors driving oil down. 'Muslim political' influence will then step in to the void left by retreating 'Jewish political' influence, and unidentified group a will be positioned to play a similar game with that group.


Because of the restive Muslim population in China, unidentified group a has been playing both ends against the middle, making a melting pot mistake roughly comparable to the one made by political Jews.

Coinciding with this event will probably be some action in the U.S., by unidentified group a, aimed at driving a wedge between evangelical Christians and political Jews.

This will probably be a symbolic event that goes over the heads of political Jews, but echos strongly with evangelicals and will push them generally in the 'fake tribal' direction of white nationalists.

A prime example would be the destruction of the statue of liberty, but there are many possibilities. It's possible that the same select group of gullible political Jews who were so easily manipulated for 9/11 will be coaxed into this operation as well.

In that case it can be expected that there will be a comprehensive exposure of their operation, and they will scratch their heads over how they got caught, never imagining that they were given the job so that they would be caught.

In the context of the current political climate in the United States, it's entirely possible that there will be 'trials' for the political Jews involved. Incredible irony will be visible to some people as the 'exposed' political Jews will believe it was 'their' operation as opposed to them being unwitting stooges of unidentified group a.

Russia, closely allied with unidentified group a, has been playing a sort of shock absorber role between political Jews and unidentified group a. Russians will be presented with a revised history of Stalin which encourages their own version of Eastern 'white nationalism' at the expense of political Jews who they had been allied with. Ever optimistic, but unrealistic, political Jews will imagine that articles like the following have an implicit hidden subtext. What will take too long to dawn on them is that the hidden subtext is not what they imagined.






 In Progress