Things to look into, generally involving melting pot trickery.


1) The top manipulators in melting pots use gender differences to control tribal elements within society. Anything that is visible is only a footprint of manipulations by a group 

2) Why are Saudi Arabia's missiles being designed to carry Iranian warheads? 

3) Once Covid and C auris converge things will be interesting

How do a fungus and a virus work together? 

Ask a bacterium.

4) A surge in undiagnosed deaths in South Sudan peaking two weeks ago

At that point the South Sudan Health Ministry, obviously a European controlled entity, releases a statement that, probably inaccurately, points to malaria. Westerners would see the problem with blaming malaria, locals not. 

Then, after the peak, some Western news articles. 

Conflict areas in Africa are an ideal area for bioweapons enthusiasts to test new microbes, for several reasons. In addition, the type of person who works on offensive bioweapons in developed countries would be drawn to testing in those specific regions.

5) Now is probably not the time to book a flight on a Boeing 787 Dreamliner 

6) Some type or types of prion disease seem to have grown pretty rapidly in the past two decades

Looking at the chart here, it's about doubled in the U.S. in 20 years. 

But if there is a 'baseline incidence' and the increase is due to some new variable then the increase is greater than it appears. In other words the 'new cases, from a new variable' are camouflaged by the original incidence until they become much higher. The kind of increase that would be more accurately visible on a log chart.

That chart only goes back to 1979, and a person does not know if 100% of cases were caught in that year, but the chart does look like it represents a baseline incidence with a new factor which is accelerating. U.S. population has grown from 225m to 330m in that time too. 

One of the risk factors involves a generic reference to sterilized medical equipment which might mean only that it is more prevalent in people who have had a lot of procedures. 

7) How involved is the state of Israel in squashing indigenous 'threats' to the global melting pot? 

The Salvadoran president is very clearly a puppet who aggressively opposes any indigenous sovereignty, and is scrambling to 'globalize' the country at the expense of the indigenous population.

8) Nothing wrong with a prosecutor getting prosecuted, but

"30 years for each of the two counts of making false mortgage applications 

 A person who can't pay their mortgage loses their house, plus all the money they put in it, so very few people are going to deliberately say they can pay a mortgage when they cannot.

That person is greedy to the extreme, a $250,000 salary and wants three or more expensive houses while prosecuting people who are mainly committing poverty crimes, but the specific 'crime' committed, 'lying on a mortgage application' is dubious.

The money was connected to a relief program, but it was a loan.

9) Ghislane Maxwell enters the danger zone 

Ms Maxwell operated for a long time under the assumption she was protected, and she was.

As her legal case continued she failed to notice things which were being set up for future use, such as the Bill Cosby precedent, and her lawyers neglected to point things out to her.

Now, though, she has stepped back a bit and is trying to show some teeth towards those who she perceives as having not defended her. Or at least somebody has encouraged her to take that stance.

This latest action on her part probably puts her at some risk, not because of the names she agrees could be made public, but because of the public perception of her willingness to let become public things which might put her handlers at risk, among which, in her estimation, are those names.

Many more lines of defense are available to her. 

But in the bigger game there are two sides.

On one side is the prosecution and defense and all the lawyers on all sides and all the judges.

On the other side is her demise if she steps too far, or appears to lean a bit to much.

The significance, of course, is that her lawyers are on the one side, with everybody else, which implies that they are part of a carefully crafted game to use her to effect a bigger strategic play against another aspect of that one side.

The similarities with the Esar Met case are interesting, notably all of the lawyers on both sides cooperatively targeting a defendant who probably should have picked a random lawyer from the phone book.

The most likely time and manner of her death are easy to guess.

Epstein died of what could be called an 'induced suicide'. He was carefully managed so that he would commit suicide and there would then be circumstances which pointed a particular way.

A suicide by Maxwell is not so easily induced, and further, a natural death would better serve the interests of the 'one side' she and her legal process are controlled by.

There are plenty of substances which could be used to induce 'natural death' in her, so a person would first look at which scenarios favor the interests of that group and which type of poisoning would then suit them.

There is no certain way to predict what they will choose, but a scenario which would pay well for them would be if she suffered some sort of medical event caused by one poison, then was hospitalized and poisoned a second time just as there were news articles implying she might 'cooperate'.

What would follow would be some sort of public Congressional interest leading to a flurry of news articles informing younger people about her father's history in Australia, then some sort of purge in those two countries with Australia landing on its feet and the U.S. a bit weakened.